News

News

Latest Articles

Search results: 1712articles

The United States will relax emissions regulations and slow its transition to electric vehicles by 2030

U.S. President Joe Biden will relax annual requirements through 2030 in his plan to aggressively reduce emissions and boost electric vehicle sales. Automakers and the UAW expect the Biden administration to slow plans to grow electric vehicle sales, saying the technology remains too expensive for many mainstream U.S. consumers and more time is needed to develop charging infrastructure. . The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposed in April 2023 that it would require a 56% reduction in new vehicle emissions in 2032. According to the EPA's original 2027-2032 proposal, automakers are expected to target electric vehicles to account for 60% of their new vehicle production by 2030. 67% by 2032 to meet more stringent emissions requirements. Sources said that with the revised final regulations expected to be announced next month, the EPA will slow down its proposed annual emissions requirement plan for 2030. The next step is expected to make the proportion of electric vehicles in total vehicle production smaller than 60% by 2030. Source: REUTERS (2024.2.21), US to soften tailpipe rules, slow EV transition through 2030

The report shows that plastic recycling cannot be seen as a permanent solution, but only prolongs the time it takes for items to be disposed of.

Recycling plastic waste has been promoted for 50 years, but a report from the Center for Climate Integrity (CCI) reveals that major oil companies and the plastics industry have known for decades that it is not a technically or economically viable solution. The report exposes deceptive marketing and public education campaigns used to promote plastic as recyclable, despite knowing it is not a viable solution. These strategies, the report claims, have enabled the single-use plastics industry to expand while avoiding regulations that would effectively address waste and pollution. "Plastic recycling cannot be considered a permanent solution to solid waste, as it only prolongs the time it takes for items to be disposed of," the Vinyl Institute (VI), an industry trade group, stated in a 1986 report. Roy Gottesman, the organization's founding director, reiterated the issue at a 1989 conference, warning that "recycling cannot continue indefinitely and will not solve the solid waste problem." Why is plastic so difficult to recycle? Thousands of different types of plastic are found in everyday items, making collection and sorting expensive. Plastic degrades after one or two uses, becoming more toxic each time it is repurposed. Despite this knowledge, oil and plastics companies continue their campaigns to promote recycling. Internal notes from the American Plastics Council (APC) staff acknowledge that recycled plastics will never be able to compete with virgin materials. They write: “In the near future, virgin supply will

New eco-friendly burial method leads to a greener afterlife

Composting (Human Composting) has been legalized in six US states, but it remains unavailable anywhere in Europe. In most European countries, the only options upon death are cremation or traditional burial. However, there is growing demand for burial options, particularly those that are environmentally friendly. Cremation produces significant carbon emissions. Burning the body in a coffin releases toxic gases such as nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide. A single cremation produces approximately 245 kilograms of carbon emissions, equivalent to charging a smartphone over 29,000 times. Traditional burials also have negative environmental impacts. The chemicals used in the embalming process can leak and contaminate surrounding soil and waterways. What is Human Composting? The body is placed in a sealed container and surrounded by a large mixture of alfalfa plants and sawdust. This organic matter quickly aggregates and naturally retains heat, avoiding the expensive fossil fuel costs of traditional crematoriums. The heat accelerates microbial activity, and over approximately 30-50 days, the body is converted into organic matter. Bones and teeth are not decomposed during this process, but are ground separately using specialized equipment and then mixed with other soil. The new soil is then left for about 30 days to stabilize and dry before being handed over to loved ones. A 2020 study published by the Catholic University of Leuven investigated how the humification process affects pigs and found that it takes much longer than expected for the carcasses to decompose and produce compounds such as ammonia, suggesting that “natural humification”

Cultured meat could save endangered fish; artificial eel rice expected to hit the market in 2025

If artificial eel meat could mitigate overfishing of young eels while retaining their delicious flavor and texture, would you buy it? As eels become a delicacy, pressure on their survival has increased, prompting startups to invest in artificial eel meat research and development. As wild young eels dwindle, eel prices continue to soar, yet foodies still cling to their love of eel rice and unagi sushi. Israeli food startup Forsea Foods is developing artificial eel meat, using organoid culture technology to create it. "We can produce a product that is identical in taste, texture, appearance, and nutritional value to eel," said Roee Nir, co-founder and CEO of Forsea Foods. This culture technology is ideal for seafood because the texture is uniform, unlike the fatty texture of beef. Forsea Foods, founded in 2021, is targeting artificial eel meat as its first product. Nir explained in an interview with Spoon that this is due to the high supply and price of eels, as well as the fact that eels are endangered. He pointed out that according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List, more than 700 edible species in marine ecosystems are facing extinction, and the number of eels has decreased by 90% to 95% in the past decade. The reproduction process of eels is quite complex. They grow in rivers and migrate to the ocean to spawn when they mature, and they only lay eggs once in their lifetime. For many years, eel farming has relied almost entirely on wild-caught eel fry, resulting in over-consumption of natural resources and the decline of wild eels.

2024 World Economic Forum: Climate Resilience Is No Longer Enough; Business Sustainability Must Courageously Embrace Regeneration

The annual World Economic Forum took place from January 15th to 19th, bringing together approximately 800 global business leaders and government officials in Davos, Switzerland. This year's theme, "Rebuilding Trust," aims to rebuild social and international trust amidst political and economic instability such as the Gaza crisis, the war in Ukraine, and an election year. Davos is a key gathering for business innovation, collaboration, and connections among decision-makers, with this year's topics focusing on climate change and artificial intelligence. Unlike in the past, businesses are no longer just discussing climate resilience; they are also beginning to consider regeneration, hoping to move beyond passive responses to climate change and embrace bolder, more proactive strategies to lead a new economy and lifestyle. The Climate Change Crisis: Shifting from "Response" to "Regeneration" With frequent extreme weather events, businesses are often faced with production crises and the increasing prevalence of carbon fees or tariffs. This year's forum offered a new perspective, arguing that corporate sustainability requires a more proactive approach, called regeneration. The BBC reported that Gim Huay Neo, global director of the World Economic Forum's Center for Nature and Climate, said that the challenge for companies is to maintain growth and create profits while also reducing carbon emissions and natural resource consumption. To achieve these goals, it is necessary to establish a new economic model and even a new lifestyle. Moreover, the new life must be better than the current life. Kearney, a world-renowned management consulting firm, also published a corporate

Taiwan's first stewed rice, "Hualien No. 26," has been launched, promising a 98% reduction in food miles traveled.

Rice is the essence of risotto. Traditional Taiwanese white rice is soft and fluffy, a significant difference in taste compared to risotto rice, which retains its shape even after long cooking and retains its firm core even after absorbing soup. The Hualien Agricultural Research and Development Center announced on the 23rd that it has developed "Hualien No. 26," Taiwan's first rice variety suitable for risotto. This rice, which imports over 100 tons of risotto rice from Italy annually, is expected to significantly reduce food miles by 98%. Three manufacturers have been authorized to mass-produce this rice through contract farming. "Hualien No. 26," Taiwan's first rice variety suitable for risotto, boasts a white and plump core. The Hualien Agricultural Research and Development Center spent seven years breeding and developing "Hualien No. 26," Taiwan's first rice variety suitable for risotto. Risotto is characterized by its rich, chewy texture, the key to a rich, chewy texture. The key lies in ensuring that the rice grains absorb the broth without becoming overcooked. Authentic risotto rice is typically imported from Italy. "When you go to a competition, the rice with white heart will usually be discarded." Yang Daji, director of the Hualien District Agricultural Improvement Station of the Ministry of Agriculture, said that Hualien No. 26 broke the farmers' accustomed thinking, because a high proportion of "heart white" (chalk plasmid) is exactly what is needed for risotto. Huang Jiaxing, an associate researcher at the Hualien Agricultural Improvement Station, explained that the higher the heart white, the more pores there are to absorb the soup. Hualien No. 26 not only has a high proportion of heart white, but is also large and fat, and has medium-chain starch. Therefore, it is very resistant to cooking and not easy to become mushy. It can meet the requirements of risotto for rice grains to be complete, chewy, and absorbent. Since 2016, the Hualien Agricultural Improvement Station has used the Italian risotto rice variety "Vialone nano" as the female parent and hybridized it with the Taiwanese "Taitung No. 30" which is resistant to rice blast and has stable yield. It took seven years.

ITRI ​​releases its first organizational sustainability report, marking its path toward sustainable development.

On the 24th, the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) released its "2035 Technology Strategy and Blueprint" and its first "Sustainability Report." President Liu Wenxiong stated that going forward, the ITRI will complete its sustainability report in the second quarter of each year to review progress toward its sustainability goals. In terms of R&D achievements, ITRI showcased its development of proprietary technologies to enhance industry competitiveness, including achieving industrial independence in key silicon carbide semiconductor materials and developing the first artificial ligament in Taiwan. To further enhance organizational sustainability, ITRI also released its "Sustainability Strategy Blueprint," showcasing its achievements in six key sustainability areas: technology R&D, industry promotion, social welfare, talent development, a friendly workplace, and a net-zero sustainable environment. The blueprint also showcases ITRI's commitment to promoting industrial sustainability by connecting with public institutions and international partners across industry, government, academia, and research to actively promote domestic and international industry exchange and technological development. Over the past 50 years, ITRI has been a key driver of Taiwan's economic growth. Now a large organization with over 6,000 employees, ITRI not only has a clear R&D direction but also discusses how to move forward toward organizational sustainability. In 2022, the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) established a Sustainable Development Committee and an Organizational Sustainable Development Office. With reference to the United Nations' 17 Sustainable Development Goals, the report was compiled based on six key areas: technology research and development, industry promotion, social welfare, talent cultivation, a friendly workplace, and a net-zero sustainable environment. The first sustainability report has been completed. Liu Wenxiong said that the 2023 sustainability report will be completed in the second quarter of this year, and the previous year's sustainability report will be completed in the second quarter of each year to review the sustainability goals.

Eco-friendly straws: bamboo, paper, glass, stainless steel - which material is more environmentally friendly?

To reduce the environmental burden of disposable products, more and more "reusable straws" are appearing on the market. But do these new manufacturing methods truly solve the problem? Due to varying comparison benchmarks, a definitive conclusion remains elusive. This time, we're letting the data speak for itself, comparing disposable and reusable straws, from manufacturing to disposal. Which are more environmentally friendly? Which reusable straws are more durable? A comparison of common reusable straw materials. First, we compared the number of uses of different reusable and disposable straws under normal usage. Steel straws, due to their sturdiness, can reasonably be used up to 500 times. Glass straws, while also made of a hard material, are more susceptible to breakage, so they can be used 100 times. Bamboo straws, being more natural, are more susceptible to moisture damage and are therefore calculated at 50 times. Glass and bamboo straws have the highest carbon emissions! Reusable straws actually emit more carbon than disposable straws! Whether purchasing reusable or disposable straws, consider not only the straw itself but also the packaging and accessories. This is because we calculated the environmental impact of various eco-friendly straws and disposable straws, and the packaging accessories that come with them, from manufacturing to disposal. It is also worth mentioning that glass straws and bamboo straws, which are called "environmentally friendly straws", are the two with the highest carbon emissions! Because each cleaning will cause 63% of the carbon emissions of steel straws, and 41% of the carbon emissions of glass straws and bamboo straws respectively. And the nylon cleaning brush head that comes with the straw is consumed by the upstream production chain due to the electricity and diesel consumed, as well as the storage bag production.

Single-use plastic out! Google Plastic Reduction Challenge: Creative Competition

In this era of plastic, a group of innovative individuals are working to reduce plastic use. In April 2023, Google launched the Single-Use Plastic Challenge, offering winners the opportunity to showcase their work in Google cafes and microkitchens across the United States. This initiative attracted numerous food companies to participate. Twelve entries were selected, and the Environmental Information Center has selected several interesting examples to share. 1. Candy That Addresses Leftover Food and Plastic: Global food waste is a serious issue, and even companies participating in the Single-Use Plastic Challenge are drawn to the allure of "ugly food." UpWorthy reports that the candy company Climate Candy was founded by Amy Keller, a confectioner from a family of confectioners. She has created an eco-friendly brand that sources imperfect but high-quality produce and crafts it into candies, then uses plant fibers to create eco-friendly packaging. This not only transforms leftover food into delicious candy but also reduces single-use plastic packaging. 2. Coffee cups become nutrients for gardens. The startup GaeaStar has developed biodegradable clay cups inspired by Kulhars (unglazed ceramic cups) used in Indian food stalls. According to "Very Compostable," the cups are made from simple materials: clay, salt, and a small amount of water. Using 3D printing technology, each cup takes less than 30 seconds to make. After drinking, you can simply throw it in the garden and crush it with a stomp.

Challenging the biggest pain point of capsule coffee: How can shell-less "coffee pods" achieve speed, flavor, and zero waste?

Have you had coffee today? Just place a small capsule into your coffee machine, press a button, and enjoy a steaming cup of delicious coffee. Convenient, fast, and skill-free, the capsule coffee market is growing rapidly, but capsule disposal remains a challenge. Recognizing consumers' environmental concerns, Swiss retail giant Migros will launch the world's first "capsule-free" coffee pod in 2022. Combining flavor, convenience, and zero waste, it's billed as the "greatest innovation ever" that will "revolutionize the coffee industry." Three wishes fulfilled at once: CoffeeB is more like a pod than a capsule. Its outer shell features Delica's patented natural protective film, which blocks oxygen and preserves the coffee's flavor. After use, the coffee pod doesn't need to be recycled or composted professionally; it can be left in your garden or flowerpot, where it will naturally decompose in a few weeks, forming a fertile compost. Migros explained that the outer shell is primarily made of seaweed, is thin, and odorless. It can be discarded with the coffee grounds after use. Like regular coffee pods, CoffeeB requires a dedicated coffee machine. Migros said that this system took five years to develop and most of the coffee machines are made of recycled materials. The highlight is the modular design, which means that replacing parts will be very convenient. The ingredients of the coffee beans are naturally not sloppy. Depending on the taste, they come from rainforest certified coffee, fair trade, or BIO organic coffee. Will consumers buy it? A year after CoffeeB was launched, Spoon reported that CoffeeB has entered the Swedish market.

Sharing instead of pricing is more attractive: Nuw gives fast fashion items a second life

Low-priced, highly replaceable fast-fashion secondhand clothing struggles to compete with new clothing in the market. To address this, the British secondhand platform Nuw uses a bartering concept instead of selling for a price. This innovative model allows the secondhand clothing market to operate smoothly, eliminating the need to buy new clothes. With the rise of new fashion trends, wardrobe changes are inevitable. Constantly buying new and discarding old pieces is an inevitable trend in fast fashion, but it also contributes to a continuous increase in carbon emissions. According to statistics, the fashion industry accounts for one-tenth of global carbon emissions, and up to 300,000 tons of waste textiles are dumped into landfills each year. Simply purchasing a white cotton T-shirt can emit as much carbon as a car traveling 50 kilometers. To address this issue, various secondhand clothing markets have emerged. On various secondhand clothing trading platforms, you can resell, give away, or donate your old clothes and buy clothes you didn't already own at a relatively low price. However, this model is generally only suitable for certain products, especially luxury goods and vintage clothing, and is not suitable for cheap, disposable clothing such as fast fashion. The reason is that people can buy new clothes at similar or cheaper prices, so second-hand fast fashion clothing is not attractive enough. Fast fashion products are low in price and rarity, making it difficult to resell them in the second-hand clothing market. Aisling Byrne from the UK witnessed the destructive impact of fast fashion on the local environment and community during a trip to India. The large amount of waste shocked her.

Carbon fee rate to be finalized in first quarter as soon as possible

my country will launch a carbon fee this year. Large emitters will pay the first carbon fee in 2025 based on their emissions in 2024. But how to charge carbon fees? How much to charge? The Ministry of Environment released the carbon fee calculation formula for the first time on the 3rd, as well as preliminary plans for charging objects, carbon rights to offset carbon fees, and preferential rates. Among them, the algorithm of "deducting 25,000 metric tons of emissions and then calculating the carbon fee" is full. Amid controversy, environmental groups criticized the move as giving businesses free carbon emission quotas. At present, the Ministry of Environment has only released the structure of the bill, and the notice of the draft is yet to be announced. Director of the Climate Agency Cai Lingyi said that relevant measures and carbon fee rates will be finalized in the first quarter of this year. 1. From whom is the carbon fee collected? How is the carbon fee calculated? According to a briefing by the Climate Agency, carbon fee charging objects must meet two requirements. One is to be identified as "the source of greenhouse gas emissions that enterprises should inventory, register and verify greenhouse gas emissions" (mostly electricity and large-scale manufacturing), and the other is to be "directly The total emissions and indirect electricity emissions amount to 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent." The carbon fee calculation method is tentatively determined as deducting 25,000 metric tons from emissions and then multiplying by the carbon fee rate. That is, no fee is required for emissions of 24,900 tons, and only 0.1,000 tons of carbon fee is required for emissions of 25,100 tons. The Climate Agency stated that this setting is to avoid setting a threshold of only 25,000 tons, which would create an unfair situation where "25,100 tons must be fully paid, and 24,900 tons must not be paid at all." Shi Wenzhen, deputy minister of the Ministry of Environment, said that the objects that should be investigated account for about 75% of my country's emissions, but the power industry also needs to deduct consumer electricity emissions. After deduction, it covers my country's 55 to 60% emissions. to

Environmental groups urge against opening the 250 million ton exemption and against using "garbage carbon credits" to offset carbon fees.

Over 500 emission sources in Taiwan with carbon emissions exceeding 25,000 tons will be subject to a carbon fee. On the 3rd, the Ministry of Environment proposed allowing businesses to deduct 25,000 metric tons of emissions before calculating their carbon allowances. This was criticized by environmental groups as tantamount to granting businesses 25,000 free carbon allowances. The Green Citizens Action Alliance pointed out that if the carbon fee is calculated at a rate of NT$300 to NT$500 per ton, Taiwan's annual carbon fee revenue would be reduced by NT$3.7 to NT$6 billion. The Ministry of Environment responded that similar practices exist in income tax and air pollution fees, and that it would respect the opinions of environmental groups and continue to communicate with all parties. Environmental groups have criticized the Ministry of Environment's proposal to offer 25,000 tons of "free carbon emission quotas." Major carbon emitters will pay a carbon fee in 2025 based on the results of this year's (2024) inventory. However, progress on related sub-laws has been slower than expected. The Ministry of Environment held a "Carbon Fee Collection Sub-Law Promotion Progress Exchange Seminar" on the 3rd and still did not propose a carbon fee rate. However, for the first time, it introduced a calculation method of "a 25,000-ton emission reduction multiplied by the fee rate," which drew criticism from civil society groups present. Chen Yizhen, commissioner of the Green Citizens Action Alliance, stated that the 25,000-ton reduction is tantamount to giving businesses "free emission quotas," potentially reducing their pressure to reduce carbon emissions. He also pointed out that if 500 emission sources are charged NT$300 to NT$500 per ton, Taiwan's carbon fee revenue would be reduced by NT$3.7 to NT$6 billion. Furthermore, the carbon fee is levied on individual factories, so companies with more factories receive more free quotas, making it easier for them to circumvent the carbon fee by adjusting production lines. Chen Yonghui, director of the Wilderness Conservancy's climate change group, said that reducing the carbon fee could result in a lower percentage of the nation's overall emissions.

Germany's carbon emissions hit 70-year low amid slowing economic growth

A new report from the German think tank Agora Energiewende indicates that Germany's carbon emissions have fallen to their lowest level in seven decades as Europe's largest economy reduces coal production. Furthermore, the report estimates emissions in 2023 at 673 million tons, a decrease of 73 million tons from 2022 and approximately 46% since 1990, marking Germany's lowest emissions figure since the 1950s. Germany has pledged to achieve net-zero emissions by 2045, decommissioning its last three nuclear power plants in 2023 after a multi-year phase-out. Meanwhile, coal-fired power generation fell to its lowest level in 60 years last year, primarily due to increased imports and declining demand. The combined effects of slowing economic growth and international crises, such as the ongoing war in Ukraine, also contributed to an 11% decline in energy-intensive output, exceeding the 0.3% overall economic contraction. However, the report also notes that most of the reduction in coal use is not the result of long-term renewable energy deployment, which would lead to permanent reductions. Around 15% represent such permanent cuts, while around 50% come from short-term effects such as lower electricity prices. At the same time, Germany is likely to miss its EU climate targets as emissions from the building and transport sectors remained almost flat last year. If it fails to meet these targets, the country will have to pay fines or buy emission rights from other EU member states. As far as German climate protection is concerned, the success of its climate policy has been achieved thanks to record new additions of renewable energy electricity, which has brought Germany closer to its 2030 target. However,

European and American startups are creating "low-carbon cement": AI helps reduce carbon emissions, solar clinker production, and the development of carbon-absorbing building materials.

Cement production emits significant amounts of carbon dioxide, yet demand for housing and public buildings continues to grow in most major cities around the world. This trend runs counter to the international consensus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, making reducing carbon dioxide emissions in the cement industry a key focus. The startup synhelion uses photovoltaics to produce cement clinker. The photo shows mirrors concentrating solar radiation onto synhelion's solar tower receiver. Image source: synhelion. According to McKinsey, a US management consulting firm, the cement industry accounts for approximately 7% of global anthropogenic carbon emissions, making it one of the heaviest carbon emitters in heavy industry. Claude Loréa, head of cement innovation and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) at the Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA), stated that even by 2050, three-quarters of the world's public infrastructure will still be under construction, and cement use is expected to continue to grow. The Wall Street Journal explains that Portland Cement is the most widely used cement in the world. During the production process, raw materials such as clay and limestone are first ground into raw materials. The raw materials are then placed in a cement kiln at a high temperature of about 1500°C to produce clinker. Cement manufacturers will finally grind the clinker and add silica sand, furnace stone and water to make it into a paste.

Global optoelectronics growth will slow in 2024

According to Wood Mackenzie, global photovoltaic installations will grow at an average annual rate of 28% between 2019 and 2023, with a sharp increase of 56% between 2022 and 2023. However, no growth is expected from 2024 to 2028. While global solar capacity will continue to grow rapidly over the next decade, the rate of installation growth will begin to slow in 2024 compared to recent years. Wood Mackenzie estimates that 270 GW of new solar capacity will be installed globally this year, while the International Energy Agency (IEA) projects 349 GW of new solar capacity will be installed in 2023. However, the growth of the global solar market follows a typical S-curve. The steepest part of the curve has been rapid growth in recent years, beginning in 2024. The industry will then pass a turning point, characterized by a slowdown in growth. While the global solar market remains many times larger than it was a few years ago, this growth path is natural as the industry matures. Currently, not all regions are at the same point on the S-curve. For example, Africa and the Middle East still have a long way to go before reaching their growth turning points. In addition, the Asia-Pacific region and Europe, with China as the main market, are driving this growth model globally. It is worth noting that any changes in China will have a significant impact on the world market, as China is in a leading position in terms of new installed capacity, with approximately 180GW of new installed capacity this year. The main reason for the slowdown in growth is the global demand for energy transformation.

Analysis of the impact of EU CBAM on my country's small and medium-sized enterprises

Abstract: Today, most countries are setting goals and taking actions to curb climate change. Among them, the European Union is the most active and progressive. It has declared in its green policy platform that greenhouse gas emissions will be reduced by 55% in 2030 compared with 1990 and by 80% in 2050. Determination to achieve a carbon neutral continent. In order to effectively curb the problem of border carbon leakage caused by increasingly stringent environmental regulations and maintain the international competitiveness of domestic industries, the European Union has decided to implement the "Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)" in 2021, which will be gradually launched on a trial basis in 2023 and is expected to be implemented in 2021. It will be officially implemented in 2026. This article attempts to understand the possible impact on China's small and medium-sized enterprises based on the current trade situation. It is estimated that the impact of CBAM on China's trade from the transition period to the initial implementation period is still slight. However, the increase in environmental costs caused by green tariffs still poses a burden to business operations, and relevant measures must be taken. Countermeasures. In addition, it explores the impact of subsequent international reactions and the EU's possible tightening measures on future development directions, and provides possible ways and suggestions for small and medium-sized enterprises to improve their adaptability or seek guidance and assistance when facing rising business costs and policy changes. 1. CBAM implementation measures: According to the latest revised specifications of the European Council on April 25, 2023, it was determined that six major items: steel, aluminum, chemicals, cement, fertilizers, and electricity will be included in the first wave of control list, and will be included in the first wave of control list in 2023. A transition period will be implemented from October to the end of 2025, and the detailed rules and follow-up plans will be adjusted according to the implementation status. During the transition period, manufacturers only need to complete product carbon disclosure and submit reports without paying any fees.

EU policy for SMEs in response to 2050 net-zero emissions

Abstract: In recent years, governments around the world have successively set 2050 net-zero emission targets. In order to actively assist small and medium-sized enterprises to develop or transform into low-carbon and sustainable enterprises, and to plan for green business opportunities in advance, they have proposed various policy tools. Common tools can be summarized into four aspects: (1) incentive control measures (2) green certification and awards (3) financial incentive support (4) technical support. Among them, there are many financial inducement support tools, including at least direct subsidies, private equity investment and preferential loans in the EU. For new start-ups that have difficulty obtaining market capital, direct subsidies are more needed to enter the net-zero path; in contrast, for companies that have entered the growth stage, through private equity fund injection or low-carbon project investment, All can encourage small and medium-sized enterprises to improve their competitiveness while providing an environment for enterprise development. In addition, the technical support tools seen from the EU's experience are also quite diverse. The essence of them is to provide cooperation platforms, institutional reforms and experience sharing. 1. EU policy tools for SMEs in response to 2050 net-zero emissions: The total greenhouse gas emissions of small and medium-sized enterprises around the world cannot be underestimated. As governments of various countries have successively set 2050 net-zero emission targets, in order to actively assist small and medium-sized enterprises to develop or transform into low-carbon Moreover, sustainable enterprises have laid out green business opportunities in advance and have proposed various policy tools. The following is a summary of the policy tools and application cases proposed by the EU for small and medium-sized enterprises in its member states for domestic reference. In order to help small and medium-sized enterprises move towards sustainability, the EU has summarized common policy tools into four aspects:

Microsoft signs carbon removal agreement with carbon offset startup Chestnut Carbon

Microsoft said on Wednesday, December 20, that it had reached an agreement with carbon offset startup Chestnut Carbon. Microsoft will receive carbon credits from Chestnut Carbon for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in order to fulfill Microsoft's commitment to environmental sustainability. Ben Dell, founder of Chestnut Carbon, pointed out that compared to other projects that generate carbon credits by protecting trees, Chestnut Carbon will plant new trees on qualified land, thereby removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and creating environmental benefits. . Microsoft's partnership with Chestnut Carbon will give Microsoft 15-year carbon credits for the amount of carbon emissions Chestnut Carbon removes through reforestation in the Mississippi flood plain. Microsoft expects to receive its first carbon credits within three years, once the newly planted trees are mature enough to remove carbon dioxide. Microsoft views the carbon removal plan as a key strategy to implement its 2030 carbon negative goal. To date, Microsoft has signed contracts with external parties for more than 1.4 million tons of carbon removal projects, including reforestation projects and carbon capture projects. Microsoft did not disclose the budget for its partnership with Chestnut Carbon, but said the project would be able to reduce carbon emissions by up to 2.7 million tons. Chestnut Carbon said that cooperation with Microsoft will help them purchase new land and develop new carbon removal projects. Source: R

The U.S. Clean Competition Act and its Impact on my country

Abstract: This article collects and analyzes the promotion and practice of the Clean Competition Act (CCA) in the United States. It mainly investigates and collects information about the U.S. regulations on the Act and its impact on Taiwanese companies, and provides suggestions on how companies can respond. Secondly, this article also summarizes the comparison between the European Union (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, CBAM) and the US CCA to help small and medium-sized enterprises respond to the carbon tariff policies released by Europe and the United States as soon as possible. 1. Overview of the bill: In June 2022, the U.S. Senate proposed the Clean Competition Act to implement carbon border adjustments on energy-intensive imported products. It is expected to impose carbon tariffs on U.S.-made products and U.S. importers starting in 2024, including Refining, petrochemicals, fertilizers, cement, steel and aluminum. What is different from the EU CBAM is the baseline for carbon tariff calculation and the objects to be levied. The US CCA Act charges carbon fees for importers and domestic manufacturers, but domestic manufacturers can obtain tax rebates when exporting to other countries; the calculation method is based on the US Department of the Treasury. The reported information is used to calculate the average carbon content of each category of U.S. products as the baseline for levying carbon taxes. If the manufacturer's carbon intensity exceeds the carbon intensity baseline applicable to the U.S. industry, it must pay carbon tax on the excess. . In addition, the baseline will be adjusted downward by 2.5% every year starting from 2025, and by 5% every year after 2029. It is worth noting that exports to the United States are taxable

error: Content protected